In this publication we presented erroneous calculations for the total amount of extrapolated fruit remains per house. This affected small parts of the text in chapters 3.4, 3.5, 4.3, as well as punctual references to the main result of the paper (mainly concerning the percentage of the total yearly calories represented by large-seeded wild fruits), mentioned in the conclusions and the abstract, and also several figures: Table 5, Table 6, Table 7 and Fig. 5. Only changes in the text are presented here, along with the corrected images
In the original publication of Boës et al. (2019), an error was introduced in Figure 1 during the pr...
The authors regret that the unit of measurement of yearly energetic production is mistyped in the pa...
In Appendix 1, and Supplementary Information Tables S1 and S2, the age class of individual [AC6726.4...
It has been brought to our attention that Table 2 in the paper by Carrivick et al. (2022) “A reconst...
When this paper was first published, there were two errors in Figure 1(b). The “Tertiary red formati...
© 2019 Elsevier B.V. The authors regret that data in the middle column of Table 3 [Yield per meter o...
© 2019 The Author(s) The authors regret an error in the paper that does not affect the efficacy of t...
peer reviewedWhen this paper was originally published, there was an error in Fig. 7g. Indeed the cur...
The Editor-in-Chief has been informed that the results in Table 1 and in Table 2 presented in the...
In the original article, there were mistakes in Tables 2–4 and associated legends and text as publis...
In the version of this article initially published, there was a mistake in the calculation of the nu...
In the version of this Article originally published, in Supplementary Table 7, the energy and land-...
The authors wish to report an error in the original version of the paper. In figure 4, panels a) and...
International audienceWhen this paper was originally published there was an error in Table 1. The ag...
The figures in the PDF version of this paper are of lower quality than intended. The publisher apolo...
In the original publication of Boës et al. (2019), an error was introduced in Figure 1 during the pr...
The authors regret that the unit of measurement of yearly energetic production is mistyped in the pa...
In Appendix 1, and Supplementary Information Tables S1 and S2, the age class of individual [AC6726.4...
It has been brought to our attention that Table 2 in the paper by Carrivick et al. (2022) “A reconst...
When this paper was first published, there were two errors in Figure 1(b). The “Tertiary red formati...
© 2019 Elsevier B.V. The authors regret that data in the middle column of Table 3 [Yield per meter o...
© 2019 The Author(s) The authors regret an error in the paper that does not affect the efficacy of t...
peer reviewedWhen this paper was originally published, there was an error in Fig. 7g. Indeed the cur...
The Editor-in-Chief has been informed that the results in Table 1 and in Table 2 presented in the...
In the original article, there were mistakes in Tables 2–4 and associated legends and text as publis...
In the version of this article initially published, there was a mistake in the calculation of the nu...
In the version of this Article originally published, in Supplementary Table 7, the energy and land-...
The authors wish to report an error in the original version of the paper. In figure 4, panels a) and...
International audienceWhen this paper was originally published there was an error in Table 1. The ag...
The figures in the PDF version of this paper are of lower quality than intended. The publisher apolo...
In the original publication of Boës et al. (2019), an error was introduced in Figure 1 during the pr...
The authors regret that the unit of measurement of yearly energetic production is mistyped in the pa...
In Appendix 1, and Supplementary Information Tables S1 and S2, the age class of individual [AC6726.4...